Whilst the Renters Rights Bill still has a long way to go before becoming law, the UK Government has made it clear that they intend to prioritise pushing it through Parliament, aiming to have it partially enacted as early as next spring (2025)! πΈβοΈ So what are the myths and the facts?
πΎ Myth: Landlords Cannot Stop Tenants from Keeping Pets
While the Bill aims to make it easier for tenants to keep pets ππ, there are several caveats. Although tenants will have the right to request a pet π, landlords can require that tenants have insurance to cover potential damages to the property πΈ. The Bill doesnβt specify every reason a landlord might reasonably refuse a pet, leaving room for discretion. Additionally, a superior landlord (property owner) can still prohibit pets π, in which case the tenant can appeal to the private rented sector ombudsman for a final decision. βοΈπΎ
π Myth: No-Fault Evictions Have Already Been Made Illegal
The UK Government has been clear: the Bill will remove Section 21 βno-faultβ evictions π«π β¦ this is NOT THE CASE YET.
The Bill also strengthens Section 8, which allows landlords to recover their property if they have a legal reason π. Similar to Section 21 notices, landlords must serve notice using the prescribed form π with the required notice period β³. If a tenant doesnβt leave, landlords must go to court and provide evidence πβοΈ.
π° Myth: The Bill Will Stop Rent Increases
Rent increases often reflect broader economic factors, such as rising mortgage rates π and other associated costs. The Rentersβ Rights Bill does not prevent rent increases; its aim is to ensure they are fair and justified ππ‘.
The key takeaway is that landlords can increase rents once per year to match the market rate, and tenants have the right to challenge rent increases at the First-tier Tribunal βοΈ, which will determine if the increase is fair or should be lowered.
β Myth: Discrimination by Letting Agents Is Widespread
Landlords have the final say over who rents their property π , and this wonβt change with the Bill. However, it will make it illegal to base eligibility checks on anything other than affordability π·βοΈ.
Itβs already the case that no responsible agent should operate blanket bans against certain groups π«.
You may find our other blogs helpful: